[c-nsp] 2821 for BGP?

[Adrian Chadd]

On Wed, Jan 17, 2007, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2007, Gert Doering wrote:
> 
> > Our experience here is, as long as we're not doing any fancy packet
> > filtering (reflective ACLs or such), it will work without *any* problems.
> > 
> > [There is one caveat - if there are multiple switches in the mix, you 
> > can end up with 'unknown unicast' flooding - but that's due to L2 issues
> > in the switch cloud, and has nothing to do with MAC checking on the 
> > individual hosts] 
> 
> Grr, this pops up when runing asymmetric L3 through different L2 paths.
> Now, if there were a way to tell HSRP to not consider standby interfaces for

s/HSRP/the router/ in that sentence.

> forwarding/routing at all (except for HSRP notifications!) the above could
> be dodged a heck of a lot easier..


Adrian