[c-nsp] Which one? 6500 or 7600

omar parihuana omar.parihuana at gmail.com
Fri Jan 19 09:11:13 EST 2007


Hi,

In a recent Cisco SP Forum I heard that the plataform for triple play
services will be 7600 and 6500 will use 7600's software for provide the same
services, 7600 is built for Triple play and  6500 will be "patched" for
triple play. I believe that 7600 will be the best option (it's my opinion).

Rgds.


On 1/19/07, Gert Doering <gert at greenie.muc.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 12:55:56AM -0800, insan praja wrote:
> > the most scalable option for this kind of network is
> > C7600, but a cisco reseller offer us C6500.
> > So guys, is there any second opinion but this?
>
> Given the fact that 6500 and 7600 are the very same hardware with a
> different
> label glued to the front, there's not so much difference *today*.
>
> It all depends on which line cards you use, which supervisor engines, and
> of course, what folly the Cisco BUs will come up regarding future support
> for given chassis/supervisor/linecard combinations.
>
> You can read up quite a lot of details on this in the cisco-nsp archives.
>
> gert
>
> --
> USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
>
>                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
> Gert Doering - Munich, Germany
> gert at greenie.muc.de
> fax: +49-89-35655025
> gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>



-- 
Omar E.P.T
-----------------
Certified Networking Professionals make better Connections!


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list