[c-nsp] PBR Strange behavior

[Afsheen B.]

Does the next hop exist in the route table? If it doesn't, the packet
will "fall through" and be routed according to the routing table.

What does "debug ip policy" say?

--afsheenb

omar parihuana wrote:
> Hi List,
> 
> I've configured an policy routing, however the packets don't match the
> policy. I re-checked the configuration and all seems fine, I don't know why
> that configuration don't work!!! (the packets traverse by default route and
> not by Next-hop configured into route-map.
> 
> I've paste my configuration:
> 
> !
> interface FastEthernet0/0.73
>  encapsulation dot1Q 73
>  ip address 172.20.0.49 255.255.255.252
>  no ip redirects
>  no ip proxy-arp
>  ip policy route-map NEXT-HOP
>  no cdp enable
>  arp timeout 300
> end
> !
> 
> !
> route-map NEXT-HOP permit 10
>  match ip address 160
>  set interface Serial1/0:0
>  set ip next-hop 172.16.1.134
> !
> 
> !
> access-list 160 permit ip 172.20.0.48 0.0.0.3 any
> !
> 
> Thanks
> 
> *The router is a Cisco 3640 with CEF Enabled that works like MPLS-PE router.
> 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 249 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20070702/3ed711e3/attachment.bin