[c-nsp] L2TP again
Rodney Dunn
rodunn at cisco.com
Wed Jul 25 08:24:55 EDT 2007
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 11:17:09AM +0200, Bernd Ueberbacher wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> My L2TPv3 tunnel is currently running fine, but I have two short but
> stupid questions:
>
> Is it possible to interfere the L2TP traffic with access-lists?
No. Not on the access side.
>
> I have to xconnect to the LAN address of the router. On the LAN side I
> just have a few /30 networks but nothing else. Should I pick one of the
> IPs from those networks to xconnect to or is it allowed to xconnect to
> the NETWORK ADDRESS of the /28 network on my LAN side? This seems better
> to me than using one of the real /30 IPs, but I don't wanna break the
> law/some RFC *G*
You should do your xconnects to loopback addresses that are routed
between the two tunnel endpoints.
Rodney
>
>
> Thanks,
> Bernd
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list