[c-nsp] AS5350 Question

[Scott Granados]

Just a parallel question relating to this thread.

Won't this type of T1 service yield bad performance?  Is this a case where 
switch lines are muxed on to a channel bank type thing and then demuxed 
again in theory adding all sorts of nice artifacts?  As opposed to a 
multipath type thing that gives you 64K channels right out of the switch to 
your terminating devices with out muxing / demuxing.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tim Jackson" <jackson.tim at gmail.com>
To: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 1:54 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] AS5350 Question


> You'd configure it like this:
>
> controller t1 X/X/X
> mode cas
> framing esf
> linecode b8zs
> ds0-group 0 timeslots 1-24 type e&m-wink-start
> !
>
> That'd create voice-port X/X/X:0 for you...
>
> 12.4(11)T supports this:
>  e&m-delay-dial       E & M Delay Dial
>  e&m-fgd              E & M Type II FGD
>  e&m-immediate-start  E & M Immediate Start
>  e&m-wink-start       E & M Wink Start
>  ext-sig              External Signaling
>  fgd-eana             FGD-EANA BOC side
>  fgd-os               FGD-OS BOC side
>  fxo-ground-start     FXO Ground Start
>  fxo-loop-start       FXO Loop Start
>  fxs-ground-start     FXS Ground Start
>  fxs-loop-start       FXS Loop Start
>
> I'd bet that this DEA svc is E&M wink-start...
>
> --
> Tim
>
> On 6/5/07, Paul Stewart <paul at paulstewart.org> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks ;)  Just purely for dial-up in a remote area....  I finally found
>> reference on Cisco's site after sending out this message and it shows
>> 48,56,64K options on each channel...;)
>>
>> All the best,
>>
>> Paul
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jon Lewis [mailto:jlewis at lewis.org]
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 4:32 PM
>> To: Paul Stewart
>> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] AS5350 Question
>>
>> On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Paul Stewart wrote:
>>
>> > We know they support PRI (23B+1D) but can you run 24 channels at 56K
>> > instead of 23 channels at 64K?  In our telco area we know this as DEA
>> > versus PRI and the older Livingston Portmasters etc support this just
>> > fine - presuming you can do this with Cisco but need a confirmation
>> before
>> ordering...
>>
>> DEA sounds like channelized T1.  Cisco's supported that for some time 
>> (i.e
>> .
>> we used to do it in AS5200s).  Are you expecting any ISDN callers, or 
>> just
>> v.34/v.90 dialup?
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>   Jon Lewis                   |  I route
>>   Senior Network Engineer     |  therefore you are
>>   Atlantic Net                |
>> _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/