[c-nsp] Cisco equivalent of juniper hardware

[Peter Salanki]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I think you have missed some important factors:

Do you need totally non-overbooked linecards?
What are your QoS requirements, will LAN type QoS (small buffers and  
few queues) suffice for your needs, or do you need hierarchical  
shaping and deep buffers?

Sincerely

Peter Salanki
CTO
Bahnhof AB (AS8473)
www.bahnhof.se
Office: +46855577132
Cell: +46709174932


6 jun 2007 kl. 18.59 skrev Auquier Benoit:

> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for info on what would be technically equivalent to one
> redundant juniper m120 configuration in terms of cisco hardware.
> Requirements are :
> - redundant PSU
> - redundant routing engine
> - ability to take 4 full BGP views and about 25 peers
> - 10 interfaces, gigabit ethernet type
> - ability to scale to 10 GB ethernet in near future without too much
> re-investment outside interface cards .
>
> Could somebody point me to the right range of models ?
>
>
> thanks
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFGZv9YiQKhdiFGiogRAiaqAKCkgvdVn53cD01paVqRJi25jh1AVACfVd3c
nqGkGQSuaOny89zzrYUMJsE=
=x4Xy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----