[c-nsp] 6506 SUP2/MSFC2 Native IOS upgrade issue
Timothy P Shortall
tshortal at umd.edu
Fri Jun 8 11:37:40 EDT 2007
I had a similar issue a few revisions ago with booting off of the disk. I
ended up upgrading the firmware of the Sup2. Were you booting off of the
disk prior to this upgrade - if not, I would recommend trying to boot your
old image from the disk and see if you get the same results.
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
cisco-nsp-request at puck.nether.net
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 10:15 AM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 55, Issue 33
Send cisco-nsp mailing list submissions to
cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
cisco-nsp-request at puck.nether.net
You can reach the person managing the list at
cisco-nsp-owner at puck.nether.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cisco-nsp digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. 6506 SUP2/MSFC2 Native IOS upgrade issue (Bryan)
2. Re: Cisco equivalent of juniper hardware (Brad Henshaw)
3. Re: 6506 SUP2/MSFC2 Native IOS upgrade issue (Jon Lewis)
4. Re: 6506 SUP2/MSFC2 Native IOS upgrade issue (David Prall)
5. Re: Sup 32 PISA not booting up on 6506E (Kamal Dissanayaka)
6. Re: Catalyst 2960G Experiences (Tom Sands)
7. Re: 6509 crash on loss of power to power bay 1 (Tom Sands)
8. Re: Cisco equivalent of juniper hardware (Phil Bedard)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:43:04 -0700
From: Bryan <bryan at tec-works.com>
Subject: [c-nsp] 6506 SUP2/MSFC2 Native IOS upgrade issue
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Message-ID: <4668B428.4040907 at tec-works.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
- Greetings all, trying to upgrade the IOS on a SUP2/MSFC2 which is
already in native move at 12.1(27b)E and trying to upgrade to 12.2.18
but I keep seeing similar errors to this:
- I uploaded the image to disk0: and set the following:
boot system flash disk0:s222-adventerprisek9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF9.bin
- Upon reboot it won't boot from the disk, it shows:
System Bootstrap, Version 7.1(1)
Copyright (c) 1994-2001 by cisco Systems, Inc.
c6k_sup2 processor with 131072 Kbytes of main memory
Autoboot: failed, BOOT string is empty
rommon 1 > boot disk0:
string is disk0:s222-adventerprisek9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF9.bin
- so I get into rommon and i force it to boot from disk0: and it appears
to load up just fine but then it just crashes and I see:
%Software-forced reload
Breakpoint exception, CPU signal 23, PC = 0x41CC9D0C
-Traceback= 41CC9D0C 41CC7C58 41A97440 41A9746C 4197D57C 419B9E64
419B0214 419B026C 407482CC 40748FB4 418D975C 418D9578 41A38A00 41A35920
41A35B3C 41CBC26C
$0 : 00000000, AT : 1E020000, v0 : 43D10000, v1 : 00000090
a0 : 505714C8, a1 : 5000BAF4, a2 : 00000005, a3 : FFFFFFFC
t0 : 00000008, t1 : 00000001, t2 : 00000063, t3 : 00000003
t4 : 5000BAA0, t5 : 00000000, t6 : 00001F6F, t7 : 5000BA98
s0 : 00000000, s1 : 42F00000, s2 : 447E814C, s3 : 087C9248
s4 : 45275A30, s5 : 451F4C18, s6 : 00000040, s7 : 436F0000
t8 : 5000BA74, t9 : 00000007, k0 : 00000000, k1 : 00000000
gp : 42F516E0, sp : 5000BB28, s8 : 00000000, ra : 41CC7C58
EPC : 41CC9D0C, ErrorEPC : 4036B058, SREG : 3401F103
MDLO : 99999A3B, MDHI : 00000285, BadVaddr : 578495DA
CacheErr : F4800000, DErrAddr0 : 1E02000C, DErrAddr1 : 805714C8
DATA_START : 0x42C4B040
Cause 00000824 (Code 0x9): Breakpoint exception
Writing crashinfo to bootflash:crashinfo_20070608-021407
=== Flushing messages (02:14:07 UTC Fri Jun 8 2007) ===
Buffered messages:
Queued messages:
00:00:56: %SYS-3-LOGGER_FLUSHING: System pausing to ensure console
debugging output.
00:00:54: RP: Currently running ROMMON from S (Gold) region
00:00:56: %CPU_MONITOR-3-PEER_EXCEPTION: CPU_MONITOR peer has failed due
to exception , reset by [1/1]
*** System received a Software forced crash ***
signal= 0x17, code= 0x436a0000, context= 0x43d15fa4
PC = 0x41cbc874, Cause = 0x3820, Status Reg = 0x34018002
rommon 1 >
00:00:57: %SYS-SP-3-LOGGER_FLUSHING: System pausing to ensure console
debugging output.
00:00:57: %SYS-SP-3-LOGGER_FLUSHED: System was paused for 00:00:00 to
ensure console debugging output.
00:00:57: %OIR-SP-6-CONSOLE: Changing console ownership to switch processor
*** System received a Software forced crash ***
signal= 0x17, code= 0x41e00000, context= 0x41e2c044
PC = 0x402d11ec, Cause = 0x1820, Status Reg = 0x34018002
Any thoughts/ideas/suggestions?
TIA,
Bryan
--
_________________________________________________
_________________________________________________
Bryan Welch Direct:(425)947-7002
Tec-Works Inc Fax: (425)821-0596
Total Network Solutions bryan at tec-works.com
www.tec-works.com
_________________________________________________
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 11:43:00 +1000
From: "Brad Henshaw" <brad.henshaw at qcn.com.au>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco equivalent of juniper hardware
To: "Phil Bedard" <philxor at gmail.com>, "Benoit Auquier"
<benoit at e-leven.be>
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Message-ID: <3B0B088532A4A44C97875AA89AEF971B080A41 at qcnexc01.corp.qcn>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Phil Bedard wrote:
> Your answers mean that the LAN-type GigE on the 7600 series
> is probably not what you want.
> Some of those cards are oversubscribed (IE, there are 24 GigE
> ports handled by 2 10-gig ASICs.) and they don't do shaping.
>
> While it's very new, the ES20 20-port GigE blade for the 7600
> I think is the cheapest option to get what you want, unless
> you need IPV6/mVPN/ 4364VPN support, which adds to the cost
> via a license.
Possibly a cheaper option is the 7600 with SIP-200 and FE SPAs or
SIP-400/SIP-600 with FE or GE SPAs where shaping is needed.
>From memory there is some level of oversubscription with the SIP's
also but I don't recall finding any clear documentation on this.
Use standard FE/GE blades where you don't need advanced QoS - the
SIPs & SPAs are just too damn expensive!
Also bear in mind that if you go up to the SIP-600, Sup/RSP720 is
Required.
Regards,
Brad
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 21:55:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jon Lewis <jlewis at lewis.org>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 6506 SUP2/MSFC2 Native IOS upgrade issue
To: Bryan <bryan at tec-works.com>
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0706072151040.3364 at soloth.lewis.org>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Bryan wrote:
> - Greetings all, trying to upgrade the IOS on a SUP2/MSFC2 which is
> already in native move at 12.1(27b)E and trying to upgrade to 12.2.18
> but I keep seeing similar errors to this:
>
> - I uploaded the image to disk0: and set the following:
>
> boot system flash disk0:s222-adventerprisek9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF9.bin
>
> - Upon reboot it won't boot from the disk, it shows:
>
> System Bootstrap, Version 7.1(1)
> Copyright (c) 1994-2001 by cisco Systems, Inc.
> c6k_sup2 processor with 131072 Kbytes of main memory
>
> Autoboot: failed, BOOT string is empty
> rommon 1 > boot disk0:
> string is disk0:s222-adventerprisek9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF9.bin
>
> - so I get into rommon and i force it to boot from disk0: and it appears
> to load up just fine but then it just crashes and I see:
That's pretty much what the unit I posted about earlier today was doing.
For the heck of it, could you post output from the following two commands?
sh bootvar
rem com sw sh bootvar
The crashing part is different. Are you sure you have enough RAM on both
the switch and msfc for the new code?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lewis | I route
Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are
Atlantic Net |
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 22:07:52 -0400
From: "David Prall" <dcp at dcptech.com>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 6506 SUP2/MSFC2 Native IOS upgrade issue
To: "'Bryan'" <bryan at tec-works.com>, <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID: <008a01c7a971$d2e01d50$90e06440 at cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
To start with you have to upgrade to 256MB of RAM on both the SP and RP to
support 12.2(18)SXF on the Sup2.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat6000/122sx/ol_4164.ht
m#wp2561255
David
--
http://dcp.dcptech.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Bryan
> Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 9:43 PM
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] 6506 SUP2/MSFC2 Native IOS upgrade issue
>
> - Greetings all, trying to upgrade the IOS on a SUP2/MSFC2
> which is already in native move at 12.1(27b)E and trying to
> upgrade to 12.2.18 but I keep seeing similar errors to this:
>
> - I uploaded the image to disk0: and set the following:
>
> boot system flash disk0:s222-adventerprisek9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF9.bin
>
> - Upon reboot it won't boot from the disk, it shows:
>
> System Bootstrap, Version 7.1(1)
> Copyright (c) 1994-2001 by cisco Systems, Inc.
> c6k_sup2 processor with 131072 Kbytes of main memory
>
> Autoboot: failed, BOOT string is empty
> rommon 1 > boot disk0:
> string is disk0:s222-adventerprisek9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF9.bin
>
> - so I get into rommon and i force it to boot from disk0: and
> it appears to load up just fine but then it just crashes and I see:
>
>
> %Software-forced reload
>
>
> Breakpoint exception, CPU signal 23, PC = 0x41CC9D0C
>
>
> -Traceback= 41CC9D0C 41CC7C58 41A97440 41A9746C 4197D57C 419B9E64
> 419B0214 419B026C 407482CC 40748FB4 418D975C 418D9578
> 41A38A00 41A35920
> 41A35B3C 41CBC26C
> $0 : 00000000, AT : 1E020000, v0 : 43D10000, v1 : 00000090
> a0 : 505714C8, a1 : 5000BAF4, a2 : 00000005, a3 : FFFFFFFC
> t0 : 00000008, t1 : 00000001, t2 : 00000063, t3 : 00000003
> t4 : 5000BAA0, t5 : 00000000, t6 : 00001F6F, t7 : 5000BA98
> s0 : 00000000, s1 : 42F00000, s2 : 447E814C, s3 : 087C9248
> s4 : 45275A30, s5 : 451F4C18, s6 : 00000040, s7 : 436F0000
> t8 : 5000BA74, t9 : 00000007, k0 : 00000000, k1 : 00000000
> gp : 42F516E0, sp : 5000BB28, s8 : 00000000, ra : 41CC7C58
> EPC : 41CC9D0C, ErrorEPC : 4036B058, SREG : 3401F103
> MDLO : 99999A3B, MDHI : 00000285, BadVaddr : 578495DA
> CacheErr : F4800000, DErrAddr0 : 1E02000C, DErrAddr1 : 805714C8
> DATA_START : 0x42C4B040
> Cause 00000824 (Code 0x9): Breakpoint exception
>
> Writing crashinfo to bootflash:crashinfo_20070608-021407
>
> === Flushing messages (02:14:07 UTC Fri Jun 8 2007) ===
>
> Buffered messages:
> Queued messages:
> 00:00:56: %SYS-3-LOGGER_FLUSHING: System pausing to ensure console
> debugging output.
>
> 00:00:54: RP: Currently running ROMMON from S (Gold) region
> 00:00:56: %CPU_MONITOR-3-PEER_EXCEPTION: CPU_MONITOR peer has
> failed due
> to exception , reset by [1/1]
> *** System received a Software forced crash ***
> signal= 0x17, code= 0x436a0000, context= 0x43d15fa4
> PC = 0x41cbc874, Cause = 0x3820, Status Reg = 0x34018002
> rommon 1 >
> 00:00:57: %SYS-SP-3-LOGGER_FLUSHING: System pausing to ensure console
> debugging output.
>
> 00:00:57: %SYS-SP-3-LOGGER_FLUSHED: System was paused for 00:00:00 to
> ensure console debugging output.
>
> 00:00:57: %OIR-SP-6-CONSOLE: Changing console ownership to
> switch processor
>
>
>
> *** System received a Software forced crash ***
> signal= 0x17, code= 0x41e00000, context= 0x41e2c044
> PC = 0x402d11ec, Cause = 0x1820, Status Reg = 0x34018002
>
>
> Any thoughts/ideas/suggestions?
>
>
> TIA,
>
> Bryan
>
> --
> _________________________________________________
> _________________________________________________
> Bryan Welch Direct:(425)947-7002
> Tec-Works Inc Fax: (425)821-0596
> Total Network Solutions bryan at tec-works.com
> www.tec-works.com
> _________________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 17:24:01 +1000
From: "Kamal Dissanayaka" <kamalasiri at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Sup 32 PISA not booting up on 6506E
To: "Sukumar Subburayan" <sukumars at cisco.com>, rodunn at cisco.com
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Message-ID:
<b8d9c6dd0706080024w67c9ce02ycdce78b963a496c0 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hi Sukumar/Rodney,
I tried your suggessions my best but was not successful.
So ihave provided console access to Cisco, they working to solve the issue.
Thanks anyway for your support.
Best Regards
Kamal
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 07:53:16 -0500
From: Tom Sands <tsands at rackspace.com>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Catalyst 2960G Experiences
To: TCIS List Acct <listacct at tulsaconnect.com>
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Message-ID: <4669513C.60209 at rackspace.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
We use both, replacing the 2970's, and so far they work great, perform
great, and have been rock solid.
------------------------------------------------------
Tom Sands
Chief Network Engineer
Rackspace Managed Hosting
(210)447-4391
------------------------------------------------------
TCIS List Acct wrote:
> We are looking to pick up a good 24/48 port Gigabit switch for some basic
L2
> aggregation duties. The main criteria are wire rate performance and rock
solid
> stability. Would appreciate to hear from anyone using the
WS-C2960G-24TC-L or
> WS-C2960G-48TC-L for this purpose.
>
> TIA.
>
> --Mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message (including any attached or
embedded documents) is intended for the exclusive and confidential use of
the
individual or entity to which this message is addressed, and unless
otherwise
expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged information of Rackspace
Managed Hosting. Any dissemination, distribution or copying of the enclosed
material is prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please
notify us immediately by e-mail at abuse at rackspace.com, and delete the
original message. Your cooperation is appreciated.
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 08:01:23 -0500
From: Tom Sands <tsands at rackspace.com>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 6509 crash on loss of power to power bay 1
To: Chris Griffin <cgriffin at ufl.edu>
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Message-ID: <46695323.5020606 at rackspace.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
We hit the same bug on this, and it sound like you are in the same
situation. It's unfortunately because 12.1(19) was a very long lived
code for us. We've had to upgrade about 4 times since due to SNMP, BGP,
and Netflow bugs.. bahhhh
------------------------------------------------------
Tom Sands
Chief Network Engineer
Rackspace Managed Hosting
(210)447-4391
------------------------------------------------------
Chris Griffin wrote:
> I think you are running into CSCeb51698. We hit this a while back...
>
> Thanks
> Chris
>
> Rick Kunkel wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Many thanks for help in the past. I'm hoping someone will have something
>> enlightening about this. TAC and Bugfinder are turning up little, so I
>> dunno what the chances are, but here it is...
>>
>> I'll paste a bunch of version and module info at the bottom of this
email,
>> so as not to clutter the part that peple are more likely to read here.
>> Essentially, what's happening is that when power is lost to Power Supply
>> 1, the router crashes. [System returned to ROM by power-on (SP by error
-
>> a Software forced crash, PC 0x4011EF5C)] Power loss to PS2 doesn't cause
>> it. If I swap the two power supplies, it still does it on PS1. In other
>> words, if the power is lost to "bay" 1, for lack of a better word, it
>> crashes.
>>
>> Has anyone ever run into anything like this? One thing to note is that
>> the input AC appears to be a bit low. I don't know if that could
>> contribute.
>>
>> Thanks much. All the relevant info that's not overly verbose follows.
>>
>> Here are the modules (modified "show mod"):
>>
>> Mod Ports Card Type Model
>> --- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------
>> 1 2 Catalyst 6000 supervisor 2 (Active) WS-X6K-SUP2-2GE
>> 2 8 8 port 1000mb ethernet WS-X6408-GBIC
>> 3 48 48 port 10/100 mb RJ-45 ethernet WS-X6248-RJ-45
>>
>> Mod Sub-Module Model
>> --- --------------------------- ---------------
>> 1 Policy Feature Card 2 WS-F6K-PFC2
>> 1 Cat6k MSFC 2 daughterboard WS-F6K-MSFC2
>>
>>
>> A show ver:
>>
>> Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
>> IOS (tm) c6sup2_rp Software (c6sup2_rp-PSV-M), Version 12.1(19)E1, EARLY
>> DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
>> TAC Support: http://www.cisco.com/tac
>> Copyright (c) 1986-2003 by cisco Systems, Inc.
>> Compiled Sun 29-Jun-03 22:45 by nmasa
>> Image text-base: 0x40008C00, data-base: 0x41814000
>> ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.2(17r)S1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
>> BOOTLDR: c6sup2_rp Software (c6sup2_rp-PSV-M), Version 12.1(19)E1, EARLY
>> DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
>> SEABD1 uptime is 1 week, 1 day, 21 hours, 43 minutes
>> Time since SEABD1 switched to active is 1 week, 1 day, 21 hours, 42
>> minutes
>> System returned to ROM by power-on (SP by error - a Software forced
crash,
>> PC 0x4011EF5C)
>> System restarted at 14:20:22 PDT Tue May 22 2007
>> System image file is "sup-bootflash:c6sup22-psv-mz.121-19.E1.bin"
>> cisco WS-C6509 (R7000) processor (revision 3.0) with 458752K/65536K bytes
>> of memory.
>> Processor board ID SAL0730H93F
>> R7000 CPU at 300Mhz, Implementation 39, Rev 3.3, 256KB L2, 1024KB L3
Cache
>> Last reset from power-on
>> X.25 software, Version 3.0.0.
>> Bridging software.
>> 2 Virtual Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s)
>> 48 FastEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s)
>> 10 Gigabit Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s)
>> 381K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
>> 32768K bytes of Flash internal SIMM (Sector size 512K).
>> Configuration register is 0x2102
>>
>>
>> A "show env status power-supply X" shows the following for PS1 and PS2
>>
>> power-supply X:
>> power-supply X fan-fail: OK
>> power-supply X power-input: AC low
>> power-supply X power-output-fail: OK
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Rick Kunkel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message (including any attached or
embedded documents) is intended for the exclusive and confidential use of
the
individual or entity to which this message is addressed, and unless
otherwise
expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged information of Rackspace
Managed Hosting. Any dissemination, distribution or copying of the enclosed
material is prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please
notify us immediately by e-mail at abuse at rackspace.com, and delete the
original message. Your cooperation is appreciated.
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 10:14:52 -0400
From: Phil Bedard <philxor at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco equivalent of juniper hardware
To: "Brad Henshaw" <brad.henshaw at qcn.com.au>
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Message-ID: <F00DE796-3AB1-49A3-8B01-44C5991D91F0 at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
The ES20 has most of the same feature set as the SIP-400, and if
Ethernet is really
what you want, it's a cheaper option. The ES20 w/better DFC is
$60k. The SIP-400
itself is $35k and then each 2-port GigE is $10k. You can only put 4
GigE ports in a
single SIP-400 before it may be oversubscribed. Whether it's
oversubscribed depends on
your packet size since it's PPS limited, not backplane bandwidth
limited.
Worst case scenario you need 3 SIP-400s with 5 2xGE SPAs, which is
$155,000. Versus
20 line-rate GigE ports that costs $60k, or even with the IPV6/MPLS
VPN license is
$100k...
The SIP/SPA GigE pricing is a lot, I think that's why they did the
ES20 for those who
need more GigE with more features.
Phil
On Jun 7, 2007, at 9:43 PM, Brad Henshaw wrote:
> Phil Bedard wrote:
>
>> Your answers mean that the LAN-type GigE on the 7600 series
>> is probably not what you want.
>> Some of those cards are oversubscribed (IE, there are 24 GigE
>> ports handled by 2 10-gig ASICs.) and they don't do shaping.
>>
>> While it's very new, the ES20 20-port GigE blade for the 7600
>> I think is the cheapest option to get what you want, unless
>> you need IPV6/mVPN/ 4364VPN support, which adds to the cost
>> via a license.
>
> Possibly a cheaper option is the 7600 with SIP-200 and FE SPAs or
> SIP-400/SIP-600 with FE or GE SPAs where shaping is needed.
>
> From memory there is some level of oversubscription with the SIP's
> also but I don't recall finding any clear documentation on this.
>
> Use standard FE/GE blades where you don't need advanced QoS - the
> SIPs & SPAs are just too damn expensive!
>
> Also bear in mind that if you go up to the SIP-600, Sup/RSP720 is
> Required.
>
> Regards,
> Brad
Phil Bedard
philxor at gmail.com
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list
cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
End of cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 55, Issue 33
*****************************************
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list