[c-nsp] Traffic Engineering considers bad ?
Bruce Pinsky
bep at whack.org
Tue Mar 6 12:33:17 EST 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Sami Joseph wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My cisco supplier company advises that i dont use Traffic engineering on my
> network because its never stable and it is not mature yet and label
> allocation is bad and in general, all vendors doesnt recommend it?
>
> I came to the right people to ask, what is true of the above, any known
> facts, any article, document?
>
Sounds like FUD to me. But the real question is what are you trying to
accomplish and why do you think TE is the correct solution?
- --
=========
bep
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFF7aXdE1XcgMgrtyYRAkx4AJ0dPSHlxB/HIwj1wCWzknCd3yHSngCfbyaO
wES8hwsJL6Tk1GMhUdXiMR8=
=fLHK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list