[c-nsp] Traffic Engineering considers bad ?

[Sami Joseph]

I was just trying to clear something i heard.

1) Traffic Engineering (in general) is not advised by Cisco or other
vendors.
2) Deutsh telecom removed it because it was complex and problematic
3) Labels corruption and mess up

Is there any truth underneath or thats all just FUD.

On 3/6/07, Bruce Pinsky <bep at whack.org > wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Sami Joseph wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > My cisco supplier company advises that i dont use Traffic engineering on
> my
> > network because its never stable and it is not mature yet and label
> > allocation is bad and in general, all vendors doesnt recommend it?
> >
> > I came to the right people to ask, what is true of the above, any known
> > facts, any article, document?
> >
>
> Sounds like FUD to me.  But the real question is what are you trying to
> accomplish and why do you think TE is the correct solution?
>
> - --
> =========
> bep
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFF7aXdE1XcgMgrtyYRAkx4AJ0dPSHlxB/HIwj1wCWzknCd3yHSngCfbyaO
> wES8hwsJL6Tk1GMhUdXiMR8=
> =fLHK
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>