[c-nsp] WS-X6148-GE-TX

[Peter Kranz]

No reason to go with the non-A model.. especially since its actually more
expense in the market currently.

Peter Kranz
Founder/CEO - Unwired Ltd
www.UnwiredLtd.com
Desk: 510-868-1614 x100
Mobile: 510-207-0000
pkranz at unwiredltd.com

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Holemans Wim
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 5:09 AM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] WS-X6148-GE-TX

I have to 'replicate' an existing 6513 switch. The current 6513 has a
sup2
Supervisor board and 5 WS-X6148-GE-TX boards.

The Sup2 board is EOS so we will go for the Sup32 engine.
I noticed in our pricelist that there is also a WS-X6148A-GE-TX board.
I did a search at cisco's website and it seems to me that this board has
more features (e.g. larger buffer/port, jumbo support) than the original
WS-X6148-GE-TX board but both are still available according to our
pricelist.
(The A-version however is cheaper). 
Does anyone know a reason why we should go for the 6148 board instead of
6148A ?


Thanks,

Wim Holemans
Network Services
University of Antwerp

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/