[c-nsp] Help with simple QoS configuration
OCOSA ListAcct
listacc at ocosa.com
Wed Nov 7 08:35:40 EST 2007
Hi Sascha,
Our QoS is done via the distribution / aggregation points (7206VXR as
well). Here is a sample for sub / VLAN interfaces.
class-map match-any all-traffic
match ip dscp default
match access-group 2000
!
!
policy-map 2Mbit-in
class all-traffic
police 2936000 91750 91750 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
policy-map 2Mbit-out
class all-traffic
police 2936000 91750 91750 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
This is the config for the vlan / sub interface
interface FastEthernet2/0.3
description blah blah
encapsulation dot1Q 3
ip address 192.168.30.1 255.255.255.248
service-policy input 2Mbit-in
service-policy output 2Mbit-out
Hopes this help or start you at least. If you have another way please
let me know as well.
Otis
Sascha E. Pollok wrote:
> Folks,
>
> maybe someone could push me into the right direction
> for some QoS related stuff. We have a setup like this:
>
> 7206VXR | 100M |c2811| .1q | 3548XL |
> Access Router | ------ | CPE | ------- | Switch | VLAN x
>
> >From right to left: a public IP network is connected to
> a switch. The VLAN on this access port is terminated on
> a Cisco 2811's Sub-I/F. The 2811 has a 100M link to
> an access-router (7206VXR). I need to give the customer
> connected via VLAN x a bandwidth guarantee on the 100M link
> in both directions. Since there is no NAT in place, we are
> able to match on source/dest IPs.
>
> I guess I would need to configure service-policies but I am
> unsure about where exactly to configure them on the 2811
> and/or on the 7206VXR. I tried class-based policies on the
> Sub-I/F of the 2811 but it said that those aren't supported
> there.
>
> Anyone with an example configuration or something like this?
>
> Thanks
> Sascha
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list