[c-nsp] ASA 5505 or Netscreen 5GT - maturity?
Gert Doering
gert at greenie.muc.de
Fri Nov 30 02:17:56 EST 2007
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 03:40:33PM -0800, jacob c wrote:
> I am looking to do a hardware refresh for my VPN site-to-site
> connections. I have traditionally used the Juniper Netscreen series
> for this and really enjoyed it.
In that case - what's wrong with "stay with what you have and what you know"?
> I am seriously contemplating using ASA 5505 boxes for the remote sites
> this time. I will have a total of 8 sites with about 25 users at each site.
>
> Does anyone have any input/recommendations with using the ASA 5505
> or how it compares to the Netscreen 5GT? Is the ASA mature? The 5GT
> boxes would run forever without a hitch. I don't have experience with
> the ASA appliances so I'm looking for some input before I purchase anything.
I completely fail to understand the mindset behind this question.
You have a working solution, and a product that you like, and the company
is still around and still makes the same sort of boxes (the SSG5 would be
the successor to the 5GT - faster, less licensing restrictions, but very
similar overall look&feel).
So why on earth are you considering going to a completely different product
family, with a different UI, and having no experience with that platform?
Just because it has a sticker "Cisco!" on it?
(We're very happy users of Netscreen firewalls. We have a few PIXen, and
we don't like them very much. OTOH, IPv6 support in PIX is better than
in Netscreen...)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 304 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20071130/4d38da9e/attachment.bin
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list