[c-nsp] Cisco RPS for 3550 switch
Daniel Suchy
ds at nix.cz
Mon Oct 1 12:51:07 EDT 2007
Hello,
On 10/01/2007 06:07 PM, TCIS List Acct wrote:
> I've reviewed various threads in the archive, and see where others have had
> problems with the RPS-300's allowing fall-back to the internal A/C power supply
> after it has taken over on the DC source. Was this an IOS issue, a hardware
> issue with the switch and/or RPS, or ?
It's a switch/hardware issue.
> Also, I keep seeing this warning in the docs:
>
> "The Catalyst 3550 switch and the Cisco RPS 300 or RPS 675 should be connected
> to the same AC power source."
I had never problems with this - I always used RPS for redundancy (using
splitted power feeds).
> We had planned to power the internal source from one PDU, and the RPS from
> another PDU (both PDUs are fed by the same UPS source, but we wanted to guard
> against a PDU failure). What is the real issue here -- and am I asking for
> trouble by ignoring this warning?
PDU's between doesn't play any role here in terms of power source, if
you have same UPS for both power feeds.
>
> TIA.
BR,
Daniel
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list