[c-nsp] l2tpv3 support in 12.2(33)SXH
jslauer at hotmail.com
Sat Oct 13 19:10:07 EDT 2007
I would love it if l2tpv3 existed in any 6500 release...I've been waiting, but I've been dissapointed :(
> Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 18:11:44 -0400
> From: dan at beanfield.com
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] l2tpv3 support in 12.2(33)SXH
> Just for the sake of the Cisco employees watching:
> I would give up my first born to have L2TPv3 (or EoMPLS but that's
> unlikely) available on the ME3400 / 3550 / 3560
> Matt Carter wrote:
> >> I would say Feature Navigator is incorrect. There is no mention of L2TPv3
> >> in the Release Notes for SXH.
> > no. say it isn't true. the cisco feature navigator wrong? NEVER.
> > imho, biggest mistake you could possible make is to look at what the feature
> > navigator says and tell someone above you (or a customer for that matter)
> > "yes we/you can do that, the cisco feature navigator says we/you can" -
> > because more often than not, the FN is simply WRONG WRONG WRONG.
> > as Bruce has mentioned, check the release notes to be sure to be sure or
> > you'll just get blind sided.
> > --matt
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Boo! Scare away worms, viruses and so much more! Try Windows Live OneCare!
More information about the cisco-nsp