[c-nsp] l2tpv3 support in 12.2(33)SXH

[Dan Armstrong]

Just for the sake of the Cisco employees watching:

I would give up my first born to have L2TPv3 (or EoMPLS but that's 
unlikely) available on the ME3400 / 3550 / 3560

:-)



Matt Carter wrote:
>> I would say Feature Navigator is incorrect.  There is no mention of L2TPv3
>> in the Release Notes for SXH.
>>
>>     
>
> no. say it isn't true. the cisco feature navigator wrong? NEVER.
>
> imho, biggest mistake you could possible make is to look at what the feature
> navigator says and tell someone above you (or a customer for that matter)
> "yes we/you can do that, the cisco feature navigator says we/you can" -
> because more often than not, the FN is simply WRONG WRONG WRONG. 
>
> as Bruce has mentioned, check the release notes to be sure to be sure or
> you'll just get blind sided.
>
> --matt
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>