[c-nsp] 6503-E with Sup720-3BXL?

Deepak Jain deepak at ai.net
Wed Oct 24 16:19:12 EDT 2007


Ahh... now this raises the question.

Has anyone actually fired up a 720 in a larger chassis (say a 9-slot) 
without any cards and seen what kind of power availability it reports? 
Or if it even fires up?

Deepak

Tim Stevenson wrote:
> This particular verbiage refers only to the 6, 9, & 13 slot systems.
> 
> Tim
> 
> At 10:14 PM 10/23/2007 -0500, mack observed:
>> I have seen several compatibility notes that state that the Sup720 
>> requires a 2500W PS.
>> However, It is also listed as compatible with the 6503-E.
>> Can the Sup720-3BXL be used in a 6503-E with the 1400W PS?
>> Or does it require combined mode 1400W PSes?
>> Or does this limitation only apply to 6,9 and 13 slot chassis.
>>
>> Obviously the power draw can be handled by the 1400W PS.
>> The real question is does IOS limit this particular combination?
>>
>> LR Mack McBride
>> Network Administrator
>> Alpha Red, Inc.
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
> 
> 
> Tim Stevenson, tstevens at cisco.com
> Routing & Switching CCIE #5561
> Technical Marketing Engineer, Data Center BU
> Cisco Systems, http://www.cisco.com
> IP Phone: 408-526-6759
> ********************************************************
> The contents of this message may be *Cisco Confidential*
> and are intended for the specified recipients only.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
> 


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list