[c-nsp] Risk of enabling ip accounting

Sami Joseph sami.joseph at gmail.com
Sun Oct 28 08:16:11 EDT 2007


Which brings us to a question:

What is the difference between IP accounting and IP CEF accounting?

Thanks,

On 10/24/07, Salman Zahid <szahid at cisco.com> wrote:
>
> Ip accounting is not supported on platforms that do forwarding in hardware
> and you cannot install a netflow card on a 4948 either since this is a
> fixed
> config box , so to answer your question , ip accounting wont work on a
> 4948
> switch.
>
> Thanks
> Salman.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Vincent De Keyzer
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 1:38 PM
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] Risk of enabling ip accounting
>
> Hi,
>
> what is the level of risk involved in enabling IP accounting on an
> interface?
>
> More specifically, this is about a Catalyst 4948 doing L2/L3 and switching
> a
> total of 100 Mbits in and out (CPU is around 15%).
>
> I believe it should be OK, but before turning it on I'd feel more
> confortable with somebody confirming that.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Vincent
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list