[c-nsp] Rate limiting questions

Tassos Chatzithomaoglou achatz at forthnet.gr
Sun Oct 28 11:50:33 EDT 2007


To make it even uglier, you can configure (using eem again) pbr under the upstream interface to send 
all these requests to the appropriate router, bypassing the connected routes.

--
Tassos


Phil Mayers wrote on 28/10/2007 2:27 μμ:
> On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 18:02 +0300, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
>> One ugly way to do it would be to create an eem applet on both routers which would do the following:
>>
>> 1) watch for syslog messages "STANDBY ....Active->xxx" and then "decrease" the metric of these 
>> redistributed connected routes through configuring the local router
>> 2) watch for syslog messages "STANDBY ....xxx->Active" and then "increase" the metric of these 
>> redistributed connected routes through configuring the local router
> 
> That only gets you halfway. The standby router still has a connected
> route which CANNOT be overridden by a routing protocol route; so in my
> original diagram if packets even *hit* the standby, they'll go out the
> 100meg link as opposed to across the gigE link to the active router
> 
> It is also, as you say, very very ugly.
> 


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list