[c-nsp] 100 meg links - VIP2-50 or VIP4-50?

[Aaron]

I'd go with vip4. Did you mean vip4-80? I the extra memory and cpu will be
needed.
Aaron

On 10/30/07, neal rauhauser <nrauhauser at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>   I have a customer who is going to provide peering links from a 7507 to
> two
> different customers. They're going to take full routes and we're expecting
> 25 - 50 mbits of traffic from each. Is a VIP2-50 with two PA-FE-TX going
> to
> handle this or will the extra juice of the VIP4-50 be required?
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>