[c-nsp] 100 meg links - VIP2-50 or VIP4-50?

Jon Lewis jlewis at lewis.org
Tue Oct 30 16:57:20 EDT 2007


I'll disagree.  While that 7507 ought to be retired :), I've seen 
vip2-50's pushing single FEs to darn near line-rate...so 2 customers doing 
25-50mbit each ought to be doable...especially if they spend most of their 
time closer to the 25mbit each range.

On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Aaron wrote:

> I'd go with vip4. Did you mean vip4-80? I the extra memory and cpu will be
> needed.
> Aaron
>
> On 10/30/07, neal rauhauser <nrauhauser at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>   I have a customer who is going to provide peering links from a 7507 to
>> two
>> different customers. They're going to take full routes and we're expecting
>> 25 - 50 mbits of traffic from each. Is a VIP2-50 with two PA-FE-TX going
>> to
>> handle this or will the extra juice of the VIP4-50 be required?
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jon Lewis                   |  I route
  Senior Network Engineer     |  therefore you are
  Atlantic Net                |
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list