[c-nsp] 100 meg links - VIP2-50 or VIP4-50?

[Aaron]

You need the memory for the routing table

On 10/30/07, Jon Lewis <jlewis at lewis.org> wrote:
>
> I'll disagree.  While that 7507 ought to be retired :), I've seen
> vip2-50's pushing single FEs to darn near line-rate...so 2 customers doing
> 25-50mbit each ought to be doable...especially if they spend most of their
> time closer to the 25mbit each range.
>
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Aaron wrote:
>
> > I'd go with vip4. Did you mean vip4-80? I the extra memory and cpu will
> be
> > needed.
> > Aaron
> >
> > On 10/30/07, neal rauhauser <nrauhauser at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>   I have a customer who is going to provide peering links from a 7507
> to
> >> two
> >> different customers. They're going to take full routes and we're
> expecting
> >> 25 - 50 mbits of traffic from each. Is a VIP2-50 with two PA-FE-TX
> going
> >> to
> >> handle this or will the extra juice of the VIP4-50 be required?
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>   Jon Lewis                   |  I route
>   Senior Network Engineer     |  therefore you are
>   Atlantic Net                |
> _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
>