[c-nsp] 100 meg links - VIP2-50 or VIP4-50?

[Scott Granados]

Personally, I couldn't see any reason to go vip2-50, especially considering 
the low cost of the 4-50's.  My 7507 experience tells me that vip is to 
under powered for that application.  (at a minimum MAX out the memory on the 
VIP regardless of what series it is)



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "neal rauhauser" <nrauhauser at gmail.com>
To: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 1:46 PM
Subject: [c-nsp] 100 meg links - VIP2-50 or VIP4-50?


>  I have a customer who is going to provide peering links from a 7507 to 
> two
> different customers. They're going to take full routes and we're expecting
> 25 - 50 mbits of traffic from each. Is a VIP2-50 with two PA-FE-TX going 
> to
> handle this or will the extra juice of the VIP4-50 be required?
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/