[c-nsp] 100 meg links - VIP2-50 or VIP4-50?

[Hyunseog Ryu]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
 
Either VIP4-50 or VIP4-80 will be fine, but you may have to upgrade
program memory to 256MB since you are talking about full routing table.

Hyun


neal rauhauser wrote:
>   I have a customer who is going to provide peering links from a 7507
to two
> different customers. They're going to take full routes and we're expecting
> 25 - 50 mbits of traffic from each. Is a VIP2-50 with two PA-FE-TX going to
> handle this or will the extra juice of the VIP4-50 be required?
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
 
iD8DBQFHJ9JdZkEzJIVS03MRAhliAJ4ob0tmrdElJDC+so7ckF50pXMJQACePdtj
AsVs4aBUyQP6+JK4i6Vg1ek=
=gHxj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----