[c-nsp] cap'ing each host/ip to bw limits
a. rahman isnaini r. sutan
risnaini at speed.net.id
Fri Sep 14 00:44:14 EDT 2007
Less budget : Mikrotik 2.9
Better bit : ETINC
Good luck.
a. rahman isnaini r. sutan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Masood Ahmad Shah" <masood at nexlinx.net.pk>
To: "'Phil Bedard'" <philxor at gmail.com>; "'matthew zeier'" <mrz at velvet.org>
Cc: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 3:39 AM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] cap'ing each host/ip to bw limits
: Packeteer packet shaper is best....Go for it...
:
:
: Regards,
: Masood Ahmad Shah
:
: -----Original Message-----
: From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
: [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Phil Bedard
: Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 9:08 PM
: To: matthew zeier
: Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
: Subject: Re: [c-nsp] cap'ing each host/ip to bw limits
:
: Well you can limit the bandwidth based on application, such that peer to
: peer or ftp downloads are not maxing out all of your available
: bandwidth. There are some good NAC (network access control) inline
: devices from places like Elacoya or Packeteer which can limit on per- user
: and per-application, if you need that kind of granularity.
:
: Phil
:
:
: On Sep 13, 2007, at 11:54 AM, matthew zeier wrote:
:
: > So I wonder if there's an alternative method to prevent over
: > saturation (or at least reduce it's impact on everyone else)...
: >
: > Phil Bedard wrote:
: >> Yes, unless they are static IP addresses and you configure policing
: >> for every single individual IP, but that doesn't sound like much
: >> fun...
: >>
: >> Phil
: >>
: >>
: >> On Sep 13, 2007, at 9:29 AM, matthew zeier wrote:
: >>
: >>>
: >>>
: >>> Phil Bedard wrote:
: >>>> What platform are you using? The 6500/7600 w/SUP720 can do per-
: >>>> user microflow policing, which would probably accomplish what you
: >>>> are
: >>>> after. As for the router type platforms like the 7200/GSR I'm not
: >>>> aware of any such feature outside of dial profiles.
: >>>
: >>> 3845 so I'm guessing I'm out of luck here.
: >>
: >>
: >>
: >>
: > _______________________________________________
: > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
: > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
: > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
:
:
:
: _______________________________________________
: cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
: https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
: archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
:
: _______________________________________________
: cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
: https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
: archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
:
:
: --
: No virus found in this incoming message.
: Checked by AVG Free Edition.
: Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.14/999 - Release Date: 9/10/2007
5:43 PM
:
:
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list