[c-nsp] 7600 w/RSP720 ip local policy route-map not matching?

[Anton Smith]

Hi all,

Has anyone experienced issues with both SRB and SRB1 and RSP720 3CXL and 
the ip local policy route-map feature not matching?

I have a policy defined as follows:

ip local policy route-map Netflow-Priority
!
!
route-map Netflow-Priority permit 10
  match ip address 190
  set ip precedence flash-override
!
!
access-list 190 permit udp any host x.x.x.x eq 9998
access-list 190 permit udp any host y.y.y.y eq 9998

I am exporting to two separate hosts.

The netflow stream represents about 5 megabit/s of traffic, I am not 
using sampling.

However, both the access list and the route-map increment their counters 
very slowly, on the order of only a few packets per 10 seconds, whereas 
the netflow stream is far in excess of that.

show ip access-list 190
Extended IP access list 190
     10 permit udp any host x.x.x.x eq 9998 (*****41220***** matches)

*10 seconds later or so..*

show ip access-list 190
Extended IP access list 190
     10 permit udp any host x.x.x.x eq 9998 (*****41224***** matches)



#show route-map Netflow-Priority
route-map Netflow-Priority, permit, sequence 10
   Match clauses:
     ip address (access-lists): 190
   Set clauses:
     ip precedence flash-override
   Policy routing matches: ***520872*** packets, 644869560 bytes

* again about 10 seconds later *

#show route-map Netflow-Priority
route-map Netflow-Priority, permit, sequence 10
   Match clauses:
     ip address (access-lists): 190
   Set clauses:
     ip precedence flash-override
   Policy routing matches: ***520873*** packets, 644871052 bytes

I am fairly sure that it has not been setting the IP precedence on any 
of the packets. We have WRED configured on some interfaces and I don't 
see anything large enough turning up in class 4 that looks like the 
netflow data.

Has anyone experienced this issue, or do the counters not increment for 
locally generated traffic?

Regards,
Anton