[c-nsp] 3550 as a BGP Router

[Mark Tinka]

On Monday 24 September 2007 14:51, Łukasz Bromirski wrote:

> So, if You stay within platform limits (SDM template),
> everything should run in hardware.

In our case, we'd be holding a handful of NLRI just for 
management (v4 and v6 loopback IP addresses [OSPFv2|3]) in 
the switches. No BGP.

Would not be significant enough to justify a default 
(balanced) SDM template, as more resources would be 
required for Layer 2.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20070924/645a5a6f/attachment.bin