[c-nsp] 7304 questions, or router in- between 65xx/76xx and 7206

Andris Zarins a.zarins at lattelecom.lv
Fri Sep 28 07:54:05 EDT 2007

Agree with Gert - if all you need is to switch packets at gigabit speeds
with lots of GE interfaces, there is no need for a 'real' router.
CAT65/76 can handle it easily.


-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gert Doering
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 11:25 PM
To: Alexander Koch
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7304 questions, or router in- between 65xx/76xx and


On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 10:02:51PM +0200, Alexander Koch wrote:
> I could be wrong, but there is seemingly no useful box that does
handle some
> real Gigs and performs normally. And the 65xx sucks because of the
amount of
> routes (go figure).

Well, you could use a 65xx-XL - 1 Million routes, should last a couple
years.  Still far less pricey than any of the "real routers" with a 
number of GigE interfaces.

USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany
gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025
gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list