[c-nsp] Soft Reconfiguration In?
Rolf Mendelsohn
rolf-web at cyberops.biz
Fri Sep 28 13:53:42 EDT 2007
Hi Murphy,
If you are already taking a full-table, then the additional memory usage is
not so much ( - perhaps 10% of total BGP usage).
If you have only a partial table or are only accepting a few routes, then the
usage increase, as soft-reconfig is storing the prefixes which haven't
entered the BGP routing table.
cheers
/rolf
On Friday 28 September 2007 17:21:55 Murphy, William wrote:
> Just wondering how many folks are using BGP soft reconfiguration
> inbound? I am currently not using it since I am concerned about memory
> usage. If it's enabled I assume it doubles your BGP memory consumption.
> Is that a fair assessment? Thanks...
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list