[c-nsp] Soft Reconfiguration In?

[Rolf Mendelsohn]

Hi Murphy,

If you are already taking a full-table, then the additional memory usage is 
not so much ( - perhaps 10% of total BGP usage).

If you have only a partial table or are only accepting a few routes, then the 
usage increase, as soft-reconfig is storing the prefixes which haven't 
entered the BGP routing table.

cheers
/rolf

On Friday 28 September 2007 17:21:55 Murphy, William wrote:
> Just wondering how many folks are using BGP soft reconfiguration
> inbound?  I am currently not using it since I am concerned about memory
> usage.  If it's enabled I assume it doubles your BGP memory consumption.
> Is that a fair assessment?  Thanks...
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/