[c-nsp] IOSW vs JunOS

[Kevin Blackham]

No mention of the version nightmare that is IOS either. For a given
platform, there are at least 3-5 compatible branches to choose from
and no clear direction of when to choose what fork (other than
fumbling with feature navigator or opening a ticket). E.g. an ISR may
have various X flavors, T and mainline, and ship with a T train for
who knows why. 7200 is much worse.


On 4/18/08, Tom Storey <tom at snnap.net> wrote:
> I notice Cisco poked at Junipers ScreenOS...
>
> Cisco has/had CatOS, and has PIX and ASA operating systems, which look
> and feel completely different to IOS, so they dont neccessarily get
> off the hook that easily. :-)
>
> Tom
>
> On 18/04/2008, at 1:53 PM, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
>
> > Sure to start a religious war but I am just pointed readers to the
> > article:
> >
> http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/041708-cisco-juniper-operating-systems.html?ts0hb=&story=wknd_wir
> > http://www.networkworld.com/slideshows/2008/041708-junos-vs-ios.html
> >
> http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/041708-cisco-juniper-operating-systems-side.html
> >
> > -Hank
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>