[c-nsp] Static Routing Question

[Brian Wallingford]

Why not "mess" with radius?  It'll apply the route & let ospf do the rest
regardless of which nas takes the call.  I may be missing something, but I
don't believe an alternate elegant/clean solution exists.  It's worked
fine for us for many years.

cheers,
brian

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Paul Stewart wrote:

:Hi folks.
:
:
:
:We're working on a project to expand some access equipment (ADSL access).
:I'm trying to figure out the best approach for customers who have their own
:netblocks.. Such as a /29.  Today, customers who have their own netblocks
:connect and receive a single /32 static address via our Radius servers.
:Then in the access device (7206VXR) we have a static route statement to send
:the /29 towards the established /32.
:
:
:
:When we finish our upgrades, the /32 static could come into our network from
:up to 3 of the 7206VXR's providing the service.  Our network is pure OSPF
:except for these few static routes.
:
:
:
:Without messing with Radius, what options do I have to inject these routes
:towards the endpoints when they are changing different devices all the time?
:This seems like such a simple question but I have yet to come up with an
:elegant solution ;)  I was thinking that somewhere in our core we could put
:the static routes in place?
:
:
:
:Take care,
:
:
:
:Paul
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:_______________________________________________
:cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
:https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
:archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
:

-- 
___________________________________
        Brian Wallingford
  Director, Network Operations
MegaNet Communications, TCIX, Inc.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~