[c-nsp] 2801 bandwidth limiting

Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) oboehmer at cisco.com
Fri Apr 25 10:24:18 EDT 2008


the following config should work:

policy-map FOO
 class class-default
  shape average 13000000

int fastethernet x/y
 service-policy output FOO

please take a look at CCO command reference (for example
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2/qos/command/reference/qrfcmd9.h
tml#wp1077189) to see the difference between average and peak shaping..
This also shows you how you can adjust your burst size..

The interface's "bandwidth" command should be set to the physical
interface speed.

	oli

Dan Letkeman <mailto:danletkeman at gmail.com> wrote on Friday, April 25,
2008 3:54 PM:

> That's kind of what I thought.  I will be able to move it over to the
> FE port soon.
> 
> So on the config for the shaping command, I create the class, match
> anything, create the policy, assign the class, and enter the shape
> command:
> 
> bandwidth 10M
> shape peak 13M
> (this should not allow any more bandwidth than 13M through?)
> 
> and then on the interface enter in bandwidth 10M
> 
> Sound right?
> 
> Thanks,
> Dan.
> 
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 1:28 AM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)
> <oboehmer at cisco.com> wrote:
>> The ports on the HWIC-4ESW (as well as on the other other switch
>>  modules for the ISRs) generally don't support the same set of QoS
>>  features as the "regular" L3 interfaces, so you can't shape on
>>  these ports. Can you move your uplink to one of the built-in FE
>> ports instead? 
>> 
>>         oli
>> 
>>  Dan Letkeman <> wrote on Friday, April 25, 2008 2:37 AM:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  > Luan,
>>  >
>>  > I have tried this, but it doesn't seem to take effect.  My
>>  connection > is on an HWIC-4ESW.  Could that be a problem?  If I
>>  use "police cir > 10000000" it works and seems to take effect.
>>  >
>>  > Thanks,
>>  > Dan.
>>  >
>>  > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Luan Nguyen
>>  > <luan.m.nguyen at gmail.com> wrote:
>>  >> I would say you need to use CBWFQ for this.
>>  >> Create an ACL match everything or whatever interested you out of
>>  your >> network and assigned to a class-map, then create a policy
>>  map  >> policy-map out >> class out
>>  >> bandwidth 10M
>>  >>  shape peak 13M
>>  >> interface WAN
>>  >> service out out
>>  >>
>>  >> -lmn
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 6:48 PM, Dan Letkeman
>>  >> <danletkeman at gmail.com> wrote:
>>  >>
>>  >>>
>>  >>>
>>  >>>
>>  >>> Bizarre response.....  It just so happens that it's a shared
>>  >>> connection and there is more than 10 available now, and will be
>>  >>> getting 20+ in the future.
>>  >>>
>>  >>> :)
>>  >>>
>>  >>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Adam Armstrong
>>  <lists at memetic.org>  >>> wrote: >>>
>>  >>>>
>>  >>>> Dan Letkeman wrote:
>>  >>>>
>>  >>>>> Hello,
>>  >>>>>
>>  >>>>> We have changed our internet connection over from 4 dsl lines
>>  to >>>>> one connection.  We have a 25mbit connection provided by a
>>  >>>>> neighboring company and we have an agreement with them that we
>>  >>>>> will only use 10mbit bursting to 12 or 13mbit.  What would I
>>  need >>>>> to do on our 2801 to limit our bandwidth to 10 bursting
>>  to 13?  >>>>> >>>>>
>>  >>>>  What a bizarre arrangement! If you had just taken 10mbit you
>>  >>>> could have just done "speed 10" :)
>>  >>>>
>>  >>>>  adam.
>>  >>>
>>  >>>
>>  >>>
>>  >>>>
>>  >>>
>>  >>> _______________________________________________
>>  >>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>  >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>  >>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/  >>>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  > _______________________________________________
>>  > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>  > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>  > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list