[c-nsp] 2801 bandwidth limiting
Justin Shore
justin at justinshore.com
Fri Apr 25 10:33:45 EDT 2008
I'm surprised that no one has mentioned using a simple Committed Access
Rate (CAR). It may not be the new hotness but it's simple, it works and
works just about everywhere.
interface Vlan XYZ
rate-limit input 10000000 xxxx yyyy conform-action transmit
exceed-action drop
rate-limit output 10000000 xxxx yyyy conform-action transmit
exceed-action drop
I never can remember the formula for burst-normal and burst-max and I
can't check it easily since I'm using a phone. That may work for you
though. CAR is simple and works but it's not as elegant or feature-rich
as its more complicated class-based kin.
Justin
Dan Letkeman wrote:
> That's kind of what I thought. I will be able to move it over to the
> FE port soon.
>
> So on the config for the shaping command, I create the class, match
> anything, create the policy, assign the class, and enter the shape
> command:
>
> bandwidth 10M
> shape peak 13M
> (this should not allow any more bandwidth than 13M through?)
>
> and then on the interface enter in bandwidth 10M
>
> Sound right?
>
> Thanks,
> Dan.
>
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 1:28 AM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)
> <oboehmer at cisco.com> wrote:
>> The ports on the HWIC-4ESW (as well as on the other other switch modules
>> for the ISRs) generally don't support the same set of QoS features as
>> the "regular" L3 interfaces, so you can't shape on these ports. Can you
>> move your uplink to one of the built-in FE ports instead?
>>
>> oli
>>
>> Dan Letkeman <> wrote on Friday, April 25, 2008 2:37 AM:
>>
>>
>>
>> > Luan,
>> >
>> > I have tried this, but it doesn't seem to take effect. My connection
>> > is on an HWIC-4ESW. Could that be a problem? If I use "police cir
>> > 10000000" it works and seems to take effect.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Dan.
>> >
>> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Luan Nguyen
>> > <luan.m.nguyen at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> I would say you need to use CBWFQ for this.
>> >> Create an ACL match everything or whatever interested you out of your
>> >> network and assigned to a class-map, then create a policy map
>> >> policy-map out
>> >> class out
>> >> bandwidth 10M
>> >> shape peak 13M
>> >> interface WAN
>> >> service out out
>> >>
>> >> -lmn
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 6:48 PM, Dan Letkeman
>> >> <danletkeman at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Bizarre response..... It just so happens that it's a shared
>> >>> connection and there is more than 10 available now, and will be
>> >>> getting 20+ in the future.
>> >>>
>> >>> :)
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Adam Armstrong <lists at memetic.org>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Dan Letkeman wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Hello,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> We have changed our internet connection over from 4 dsl lines to
>> >>>>> one connection. We have a 25mbit connection provided by a
>> >>>>> neighboring company and we have an agreement with them that we
>> >>>>> will only use 10mbit bursting to 12 or 13mbit. What would I need
>> >>>>> to do on our 2801 to limit our bandwidth to 10 bursting to 13?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>> What a bizarre arrangement! If you had just taken 10mbit you
>> >>>> could have just done "speed 10" :)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> adam.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> >>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list