[c-nsp] 2801 bandwidth limiting

[Dan Letkeman]

Justin,

Yes I tried that and it did work, but I think shaping is the preferred
method for us.

Thanks,
Dan.

On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Justin Shore <justin at justinshore.com> wrote:
> I'm surprised that no one has mentioned using a simple Committed Access Rate
> (CAR).  It may not be the new hotness but it's simple, it works and works
> just about everywhere.
>
>  interface Vlan XYZ
>   rate-limit input 10000000 xxxx yyyy conform-action transmit exceed-action
> drop
>   rate-limit output 10000000 xxxx yyyy conform-action transmit exceed-action
> drop
>
>  I never can remember the formula for burst-normal and burst-max and I can't
> check it easily since I'm using a phone.  That may work for you though.  CAR
> is simple and works but it's not as elegant or feature-rich as its more
> complicated class-based kin.
>
>  Justin
>
>
>
>  Dan Letkeman wrote:
>
> > That's kind of what I thought.  I will be able to move it over to the
> > FE port soon.
> >
> > So on the config for the shaping command, I create the class, match
> > anything, create the policy, assign the class, and enter the shape
> > command:
> >
> > bandwidth 10M
> > shape peak 13M
> > (this should not allow any more bandwidth than 13M through?)
> >
> > and then on the interface enter in bandwidth 10M
> >
> > Sound right?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dan.
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 1:28 AM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)
> > <oboehmer at cisco.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The ports on the HWIC-4ESW (as well as on the other other switch modules
> > >  for the ISRs) generally don't support the same set of QoS features as
> > >  the "regular" L3 interfaces, so you can't shape on these ports. Can you
> > >  move your uplink to one of the built-in FE ports instead?
> > >
> > >        oli
> > >
> > >  Dan Letkeman <> wrote on Friday, April 25, 2008 2:37 AM:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  > Luan,
> > >  >
> > >  > I have tried this, but it doesn't seem to take effect.  My connection
> > >  > is on an HWIC-4ESW.  Could that be a problem?  If I use "police cir
> > >  > 10000000" it works and seems to take effect.
> > >  >
> > >  > Thanks,
> > >  > Dan.
> > >  >
> > >  > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Luan Nguyen
> > >  > <luan.m.nguyen at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >  >> I would say you need to use CBWFQ for this.
> > >  >> Create an ACL match everything or whatever interested you out of
> your
> > >  >> network and assigned to a class-map, then create a policy map
> > >  >> policy-map out
> > >  >> class out
> > >  >> bandwidth 10M
> > >  >>  shape peak 13M
> > >  >> interface WAN
> > >  >> service out out
> > >  >>
> > >  >> -lmn
> > >  >>
> > >  >>
> > >  >>
> > >  >> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 6:48 PM, Dan Letkeman
> > >  >> <danletkeman at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >  >>
> > >  >>>
> > >  >>>
> > >  >>>
> > >  >>> Bizarre response.....  It just so happens that it's a shared
> > >  >>> connection and there is more than 10 available now, and will be
> > >  >>> getting 20+ in the future.
> > >  >>>
> > >  >>> :)
> > >  >>>
> > >  >>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Adam Armstrong <lists at memetic.org>
> > >  >>> wrote:
> > >  >>>
> > >  >>>>
> > >  >>>> Dan Letkeman wrote:
> > >  >>>>
> > >  >>>>> Hello,
> > >  >>>>>
> > >  >>>>> We have changed our internet connection over from 4 dsl lines to
> > >  >>>>> one connection.  We have a 25mbit connection provided by a
> > >  >>>>> neighboring company and we have an agreement with them that we
> > >  >>>>> will only use 10mbit bursting to 12 or 13mbit.  What would I need
> > >  >>>>> to do on our 2801 to limit our bandwidth to 10 bursting to 13?
> > >  >>>>>
> > >  >>>>>
> > >  >>>>  What a bizarre arrangement! If you had just taken 10mbit you
> > >  >>>> could have just done "speed 10" :)
> > >  >>>>
> > >  >>>>  adam.
> > >  >>>
> > >  >>>
> > >  >>>
> > >  >>>>
> > >  >>>
> > >  >>> _______________________________________________
> > >  >>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > >  >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > >  >>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> > >  >>>
> > >  >>
> > >  >>
> > >  > _______________________________________________
> > >  > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > >  > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > >  > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
> >
> >
>