[c-nsp] BFD aware VRF

[Vikas Sharma]

Hi Aaron,

If you have customer who wants redundancy for CE -PE , and switchover should
be very fast .. .. then u have to implement BFD..BFD can be on ethernet
also.

Hope it clears..

Regards


On 2/9/08, Aaron <dudepron at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Why do you need bfd on a serial interface? Seems like a waste of CPU and
> BW.
>
> On Feb 4, 2008 1:12 PM, Luan Nguyen <luan.m.nguyen at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I have bgp running between PE and CE.
> > So on the PE, you do:
> > router bgp xxxx
> > address-family ipv4 vrf whatever
> > neighbor y.y.y.y fall-over bfd
> > Do the same for the CE under bgp.
> > Then on the link between CE and PE, configured the bfd interval...etc.
> >  That
> > should work.
> >
> > The problem is my CE is a 1841 with a Channelized T1/PRI port and even
> > with
> > the latest 12.4.15T3, i can't put the bfd command under the serial
> > interface!  Without interface level bfd command, bfd won't work.  Hello?
> > I did try with an ethernet link between PE and CE, and bfd config looks
> > good.
> >
> > -lmn
> >
> >
> > On Feb 4, 2008 11:47 AM, Vikas Sharma <vikassharmas at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Anyone have configured VRF aware BFD? If yes pls let me know how?
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Vikas Sharma
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
> >
>
>