[c-nsp] Decent Network Documentation and Topology
Alex Howells
alex at bytemark.co.uk
Sat Feb 9 19:00:49 EST 2008
Kim Onnel wrote:
> Please unicast me a copy of documentation you did or came across that you
> consider "Ideal" or good enough because I have lost the sense of how a good
> one would look like, I am supporting a corporate network with a lot of
> switches and firewalls and another with MGXs.
Wow, that's a broad request ;)
How big are your intertubes for receiving such unicast goodness? :-P
Suitably fat I presume, someone might send you Wikipedia, or cisco.com!
> 1) Physical (Switch interfaces + trunks+ vlans)
>
> 2) Logical (IP addresses, routes)
>
> 3) Traffic flow in accordance with spanning tree?
>
> 4) Excel sheet with interfaces names and description
>
> 5) Anything else?
Did you have any more specific questions about each of the list above?
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list