[c-nsp] Decent Network Documentation and Topology

Alex Howells alex at bytemark.co.uk
Sat Feb 9 19:00:49 EST 2008


Kim Onnel wrote:
> Please unicast me a copy of documentation you did or came across that you
> consider "Ideal" or good enough because I have lost the sense of how a good
> one would look like, I am supporting a corporate network with a lot of
> switches and firewalls and another with MGXs.

Wow, that's a broad request ;)

How big are your intertubes for receiving such unicast goodness? :-P 
Suitably fat I presume, someone might send you Wikipedia, or cisco.com!

> 1)       Physical (Switch interfaces + trunks+ vlans)
> 
> 2)       Logical (IP addresses, routes)
> 
> 3)       Traffic flow in accordance with spanning tree?
> 
> 4)       Excel sheet with interfaces names and description
> 
> 5)       Anything else?

Did you have any more specific questions about each of the list above?


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list