[c-nsp] IOS for NBAR on 7206VXR/300

[Adam Greene]

Thanks all. I wish it were as simple as getting a new processor.

Being stuck with the NPE-300 for now, I'll probably go the route of adding 
PDLM's.

Note on the 12.4 issues: what kind of memory issues were you seeing, Ben? We 
only manage about 12 routes on this router between OSPF and BGP so I wonder 
if that would really be an issue for us.

Thanks,
Adam

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ben Steele" <ben at internode.com.au>
To: "Joseph Jackson" <jjackson at aninetworks.com>
Cc: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 1:17 AM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IOS for NBAR on 7206VXR/300


> That's funny because TAC actually asked me to upgrade the NPE-300 to
> 12.4(18) from 12.4(17a), then again everyone gets mixed results with
> TAC.
>
> On 12/02/2008, at 3:36 PM, Joseph Jackson wrote:
>
>> I was told by TAC that 12.2 was the latest release of IOS that is
>> support on the 300.  So if you have a problem they'll make you
>> downgrade.
>>
>> On 2/11/08, Christian Koch <christian at visr.org> wrote:
>> just get rid of the 300... :)
>>
>> On Feb 11, 2008 7:56 PM, Ben Steele <ben at internode.com.au> wrote:
>>
>> > Be careful if your going to run 12.4 on a NPE-300 or less when you
>> > have BGP and especially MPLS VPN's as you start to run into memory
>> > problems which for me resulted in unstable routing tables.
>> >
>> > 12.3(14)T7 is working well for me on NPE-300's with BGP/MPLS VPN's
>> and
>> > also capable of doing NBAR, you can probably just put any extra
>> PDLM's
>> > you require into flash if they aren't already in NBAR for you.
>> >
>> > Ben
>> >
>> > On 12/02/2008, at 11:13 AM, Adam Greene wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > Any suggestions for a stable advanced ip services 12.4 IOS for
>> > > 7206VXR-NPE300 which will support BGP routing and NBAR?
>> > >
>> > > Looks like the last peer-to-peer protocol recognition enhancement
>> > > was done in 12.4(4)T.
>> > >
>> > > I wonder if 12.4(4)T is stable in general. It's the T which scares
>> > > me. And it's an older processor. Maybe I shouldn't worry.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Adam
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
>
>
>