[c-nsp] IOS for NBAR on 7206VXR/300

[Ben Steele]

Oh you should be fine with only 12 routes, this was about 150-200k  
routes and probably 12-15 vrf's.

On 13/02/2008, at 11:15 AM, Adam Greene wrote:

> Thanks all. I wish it were as simple as getting a new processor.
>
> Being stuck with the NPE-300 for now, I'll probably go the route of  
> adding PDLM's.
>
> Note on the 12.4 issues: what kind of memory issues were you seeing,  
> Ben? We only manage about 12 routes on this router between OSPF and  
> BGP so I wonder if that would really be an issue for us.
>
> Thanks,
> Adam
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ben Steele" <ben at internode.com.au>
> To: "Joseph Jackson" <jjackson at aninetworks.com>
> Cc: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 1:17 AM
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IOS for NBAR on 7206VXR/300
>
>
>> That's funny because TAC actually asked me to upgrade the NPE-300 to
>> 12.4(18) from 12.4(17a), then again everyone gets mixed results with
>> TAC.
>>
>> On 12/02/2008, at 3:36 PM, Joseph Jackson wrote:
>>
>>> I was told by TAC that 12.2 was the latest release of IOS that is
>>> support on the 300.  So if you have a problem they'll make you
>>> downgrade.
>>>
>>> On 2/11/08, Christian Koch <christian at visr.org> wrote:
>>> just get rid of the 300... :)
>>>
>>> On Feb 11, 2008 7:56 PM, Ben Steele <ben at internode.com.au> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Be careful if your going to run 12.4 on a NPE-300 or less when you
>>> > have BGP and especially MPLS VPN's as you start to run into memory
>>> > problems which for me resulted in unstable routing tables.
>>> >
>>> > 12.3(14)T7 is working well for me on NPE-300's with BGP/MPLS VPN's
>>> and
>>> > also capable of doing NBAR, you can probably just put any extra
>>> PDLM's
>>> > you require into flash if they aren't already in NBAR for you.
>>> >
>>> > Ben
>>> >
>>> > On 12/02/2008, at 11:13 AM, Adam Greene wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Hi,
>>> > >
>>> > > Any suggestions for a stable advanced ip services 12.4 IOS for
>>> > > 7206VXR-NPE300 which will support BGP routing and NBAR?
>>> > >
>>> > > Looks like the last peer-to-peer protocol recognition  
>>> enhancement
>>> > > was done in 12.4(4)T.
>>> > >
>>> > > I wonder if 12.4(4)T is stable in general. It's the T which  
>>> scares
>>> > > me. And it's an older processor. Maybe I shouldn't worry.
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks,
>>> > > Adam
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>> > > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>> > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>> >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>