[c-nsp] redundant VPNs

[Luan Nguyen]

1800/2800 should have no problem handling T1 VPN.  Use AIM-SSL1/SSL2
encryption cards for them.  Tag on Zone-base FW and IOS IPS and your
customer should feel "safe" :)

-lmn

On Feb 20, 2008 11:48 AM, Adam Greene <maillist at webjogger.net> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> A customer of ours has two sites, one with an 1800 the other with a 2800.
> There's a point-to-point T1 connecting the locations. The two locations also
> have a backup link through my network via DSL.
>
> The customer wants to establish a VPN between the two locations over the
> ptp T1, and a backup VPN over the DSL lines in case the ptp T1 goes down.
>
> I should be able to rely on the 1800/2800 for this, shouldn't I? I can add
> sonicwalls on each end if needed, but I think the routers should be able to
> handle it alone. What do you think?
>
> Thanks,
> Adam
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>