[c-nsp] redundant VPNs

[Church, Charles]

Should be fine.  Both models have built-in VPN accelerators, should
haven't a couple megabit without skipping a beat. 


Chuck Church
Principal Network Engineer, CCIE #8776
Harris Information Technology Services
EDS Contractor - Navy Marine Corps Intranet (NMCI)
1210 N. Parker Rd. | Greenville, SC 29609 
Office: 864-335-9473 | Cell: 864-266-3978


-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Adam Greene
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 11:48 AM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] redundant VPNs


Hi,

A customer of ours has two sites, one with an 1800 the other with a
2800. There's a point-to-point T1 connecting the locations. The two
locations also have a backup link through my network via DSL.

The customer wants to establish a VPN between the two locations over the
ptp T1, and a backup VPN over the DSL lines in case the ptp T1 goes
down.

I should be able to rely on the 1800/2800 for this, shouldn't I? I can
add sonicwalls on each end if needed, but I think the routers should be
able to handle it alone. What do you think?

Thanks,
Adam
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/