[c-nsp] Non-cisco product integration into CISCO

[Tom Storey]

On 04/01/2008, at 8:09 PM, Tom Storey wrote:

>
> On 04/01/2008, at 8:02 PM, Simon Lockhart wrote:
>
>> On Fri Jan 04, 2008 at 04:40:11PM +0800, Dracul wrote:
>>> interface FastEthernet0/14
>>> switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
>>> switchport trunk native vlan 100
>>> switchport mode trunk
>>> switchport nonegotiate
>>> end
>>>
>>> There are two VLANs used in the network VLAN 1 and VLAN 100. what
>>> we are
>>> looking at is the VLAN 100
>>
>> So you're trying to put the Amino STB in VLAN 100? Try this instead:
>>
>> interface FastEthernet0/14
>> switchport mode access
>> switchport access vlan 100
>> spanning-tree portfast
>>
>> At the moment you've got it configured as a trunk port, with non-
>> tagged frames
>> being put in vlan 100. Whilst this shouldn't cause a problem, you
>> can simplify
>> it by configuring it as an access port instead.
>>
>> Simon
>
> I was about to ask if he could get away with running it as an access
> port, but he spcifically mentioned trunking, so I was of the
> impression that he needed both VLANs trunked to the box.
>
> Otherwise yes, if he needs it *only* in VLAN 100, setting it up as a
> trunk port will do. But my guess is theres another reason that a
> second VLAN is neccessary, e.g. Internet access which is provided via
> a seperate VLAN.

Access port, not trunk port.