[c-nsp] Non-cisco product integration into CISCO

[Dracul]

Hi Tom,

You're correct. The other VLAN1 is used for internet

On Jan 4, 2008 5:09 PM, Tom Storey <tom at snnap.net> wrote:

>
> On 04/01/2008, at 8:02 PM, Simon Lockhart wrote:
>
> > On Fri Jan 04, 2008 at 04:40:11PM +0800, Dracul wrote:
> >> interface FastEthernet0/14
> >> switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
> >> switchport trunk native vlan 100
> >> switchport mode trunk
> >> switchport nonegotiate
> >> end
> >>
> >> There are two VLANs used in the network VLAN 1 and VLAN 100. what
> >> we are
> >> looking at is the VLAN 100
> >
> > So you're trying to put the Amino STB in VLAN 100? Try this instead:
> >
> > interface FastEthernet0/14
> >  switchport mode access
> >  switchport access vlan 100
> >  spanning-tree portfast
> >
> > At the moment you've got it configured as a trunk port, with non-
> > tagged frames
> > being put in vlan 100. Whilst this shouldn't cause a problem, you
> > can simplify
> > it by configuring it as an access port instead.
> >
> > Simon
>
> I was about to ask if he could get away with running it as an access
> port, but he spcifically mentioned trunking, so I was of the
> impression that he needed both VLANs trunked to the box.
>
> Otherwise yes, if he needs it *only* in VLAN 100, setting it up as a
> trunk port will do. But my guess is theres another reason that a
> second VLAN is neccessary, e.g. Internet access which is provided via
> a seperate VLAN.
>



-- 
===
Support www.gawadkalinga.org