[c-nsp] Current CCNA tests

Marko Milivojevic markom at vodafone.is
Wed Jan 9 11:32:49 EST 2008


Yes and no. If memory serves me well, Windows still doesn't like being assigned .0 and .255 as an IP address. Plenty of applications out there are way too confused with these to make them useful.

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of A.L.M.Buxey at lboro.ac.uk
Sent: 8. janúar 2008 23:18
To: Peter Rathlev
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Current CCNA tests

Hi,

> I may be pedantic now (it' getting late!), but "ip subnet-zero" doesn't
> change the number of hosts you can cram into an unsubnetted /24
> network, class C or otherwise, does it? As I understand it, it just

pretty much right - it allows you to use some freaky /24's within your
available space - but its more important when using /23's and the
like where you can use .0 and .255 addresses within the space.

alan
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list