[c-nsp] HSRP Interface Tracking

[Arie Vayner]

Virendra,

You can configure the penalty for each link going down. This will be
subtracted from the priority of the primary router. When the standby's
priority will get higher than the penalized value, it would take over.

You can also create different HSRP groups, each tracking different WAN
interfaces. This makes sense only if different devices on the LAN correspond
to different WAN links...

Arie

On Jan 9, 2008 6:52 PM, virendra rode // <virendra.rode at gmail.com> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> Just wondering whether anyone is running similar setup in their
> environment with either HSRP or GLBP. Due to lack of hardware I'm unable
> to create this scenario in my lab so any sort of feedback will be
> greatly appreciated.
>
> I have 2 routers in a HSRP setup where I have multiple p2p links coming
> into ROUTER-A and ROUTER-B being used for dial-backup scenario.
>
> Say if I lost a p2p link on ROUTER-A and in a tracking scenario for
> multiple p2p links would ROUTER-A switch over to standby although other
> p2p links off ROUTER-A are still up and running? Is there a way to track
> via network or would GLBP  be a better fit for this scenario.
>
>
>           /---------ROUTER-A
>
>          /             ||
>
>                HSRP between these two SVI's
>
>          \             ||
>
>           \---------ROUTER-B
>
>
>
> Let me know if you need further clarification.
>
>
>
> regards,
> /virendra
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFHhPvNpbZvCIJx1bcRArfMAKDdZMhYa2zImIxTGrgcvAw/N5x17QCfWyyC
> OjAMIGsR+NJu4th27hfn/xM=
> =CLW2
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>