[c-nsp] RIB_failure

[Suzan S.]

I think we will loose points if we are getting RIB-Failure routes in the lab exam, so I think we have to prefer the BGP routes and to change the administrative distance for the iBGP routes! Is this the right solution?
   
  Thanks
   
  

Phil Bedard <philxor at gmail.com> wrote:
  What are you trying to accomplish exactly? If you want to use the BGP 
routes as primary versus the IGP routes, you can set the 
administrative distance higher for the IGP learned routes. Suppress- 
inactive will keep the BGP peer from re-advertising those RIB-failure 
routes to another peer. RIB-Failure isn't necessarily a problem...

Phil


On Jan 18, 2008, at 4:20 PM, Suzan S. wrote:

> Dears,
>
> When advertiseing the loopbacks in the bgp , they appear as RIB- 
> failure routes in the BGP table as they are advertised through the 
> IGP which has better adminstrative distance. Any one knows how to 
> solve the problem of these RIB-failure Routes? Do we have to change 
> the administrative distance for the IGP or BGP ? In some documents I 
> read that we have to use the command bgp suppress-active under the 
> router bgp config but it does not work.
>
> Thank you All
>
> Suzan
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! 
> Search.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



       
---------------------------------
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.