[c-nsp] Telnet FROM a PIX Appliance?

Ted Mittelstaedt tedm at toybox.placo.com
Sun Jul 6 02:26:49 EDT 2008



> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Peder @
> NetworkOblivion
> Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 5:28 AM
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net >> Cisco-NSP Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Telnet FROM a PIX Appliance?
> 
> 
> What!?  The original PIX code was < 500k as the first versions from 
> Network Translations only had 512k flash moodules in them.  There is no 
> way that it was based on Windows, not even 3.1.  I think you are 
> thinking of the Centri (or whatever it was called) that was windows 
> based that they bought many years ago.  I actually worked at Cisco when 
> they bought the PIX and the Centri and then they killed the Centri 
> shortly thereafter.  I think the Centri ran on Windows 95, but I am not 
> 100% sure as that was 10+ years ago.
> 

Interesting, I'm sure your correct.

> IMO, the reason that so many people use(d) the PIX is that they just 
> work.

I disagree.  The reason they use them is they are cheap.  Cisco
did not require a separate IOS license the way that they do with
a router running IOS-Firewall Feature set.

Ted


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list