[c-nsp] Cisco MMPPP

[Edi Guntoro]

Thanks Ben,
however what do you mean by "better off load balancing with a routing protocol and/or cef" ? is it disabling the load balancing? as I know this feature enable by default on routing protocol as long as they are equal admin distances.
And is it for traffic out to the internet or traffic coming to the customer ?
regards.
Edi





----- Original Message ----
From: Ben Steele <ben.steele at internode.on.net>
To: Edi Guntoro <igoen99 at yahoo.com>
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 12:12:12 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco MMPPP

the LAC is pretty irrelevant, you need to configure MMPPP capabilities  
on your LNS's, which means an sgbp group on your LNS's for the  
multichassis and "ppp multilink" under your virtual template for the  
MPPP side of things.

I noticed your topology is using 2 seperate wireless services to  
provide the bundle, one word of warning is if the bundles are out of  
sync (speed and latency wise) you will see very poor performance and  
you are better off load balancing with a routing protocol and/or cef.

Ben

On 16/07/2008, at 2:13 PM, Edi Guntoro wrote:

> Dear ciscoers,
> Let's say we have a scenario to bring up multiple ppp for our  
> customer to increase bandwidth to the internet.
> At the moment we only have access to the LNS, is it possible to have  
> MMPPP for our customer, or is there something to do with the LAC?
> any reference?
> here is the layout:
> regards
> Igun
>
>
> u /-----3.5g service---PPP---LAC---LNS1--|
> s/                                                             | 
> ___internet
> e\                                                             |
> r \-----cdma service--PPP---LAC---LNS2--|
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/