[c-nsp] Cisco MMPPP

[Ben Steele]

Yes it's possible to have say windows do multilink ppp through 2  
seperate network devices, never tried it though so not sure how  
reliable their implementation of it is.

Ben

On 16/07/2008, at 5:12 PM, Edi Guntoro wrote:

>
> Thanks Ben,
> I understand now. Coz previously, regarding the user I though this  
> is a single user with PC/notebook/windows dialing using two  
> different wireless service... is it possible?
> regards
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Ben Steele <ben.steele at internode.on.net>
> To: Edi Guntoro <igoen99 at yahoo.com>
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 2:21:27 PM
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco MMPPP
>
> i'm talking strictly between your LNS and your CPE here, if you find  
> your MMPPP is giving poor performance due to physical differences  
> between the 2 sessions (ie speed and latency), then try doing  
> something a little more creative like multihopping both ppp sessions  
> onto the one router and using (as you mentioned) cef per-destination  
> load sharing over the 2 unique ppp sessions, or alternatively let a  
> routing protocol handle the work and advertise part of your subnet  
> out one link and part out the other with redundancy, or even GRE  
> tunnels etc etc.. there are quite a few ways you can achieve the  
> desired outcome, this is of course only if your mmppp fails.
>
> Cheers
>
> Ben
>
> On 16/07/2008, at 4:11 PM, Edi Guntoro wrote:
>
>> Thanks Ben,
>> however what do you mean by "better off load balancing with a  
>> routing protocol and/or cef" ? is it disabling the load balancing?  
>> as I know this feature enable by default on routing protocol as  
>> long as they are equal admin distances.
>> And is it for traffic out to the internet or traffic coming to the  
>> customer ?
>> regards.
>> Edi
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Ben Steele <ben.steele at internode.on.net>
>> To: Edi Guntoro <igoen99 at yahoo.com>
>> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 12:12:12 PM
>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco MMPPP
>>
>> the LAC is pretty irrelevant, you need to configure MMPPP  
>> capabilities
>> on your LNS's, which means an sgbp group on your LNS's for the
>> multichassis and "ppp multilink" under your virtual template for the
>> MPPP side of things.
>>
>> I noticed your topology is using 2 seperate wireless services to
>> provide the bundle, one word of warning is if the bundles are out of
>> sync (speed and latency wise) you will see very poor performance and
>> you are better off load balancing with a routing protocol and/or cef.
>>
>> Ben
>>
>> On 16/07/2008, at 2:13 PM, Edi Guntoro wrote:
>>
>> > Dear ciscoers,
>> > Let's say we have a scenario to bring up multiple ppp for our
>> > customer to increase bandwidth to the internet.
>> > At the moment we only have access to the LNS, is it possible to  
>> have
>> > MMPPP for our customer, or is there something to do with the LAC?
>> > any reference?
>> > here is the layout:
>> > regards
>> > Igun
>> >
>> >
>> > u /-----3.5g service---PPP---LAC---LNS1--|
>> > s/                                                            |
>> > ___internet
>> > e\                                                            |
>> > r \-----cdma service--PPP---LAC---LNS2--|
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>