[c-nsp] Cisco MMPPP

Edi Guntoro igoen99 at yahoo.com
Wed Jul 16 03:42:05 EDT 2008



Thanks Ben, 
I understand now. Coz previously, regarding the user I though this is a single user with PC/notebook/windows dialing using two different wireless service... is it possible?
regards






----- Original Message ----
From: Ben Steele <ben.steele at internode.on.net>
To: Edi Guntoro <igoen99 at yahoo.com>
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 2:21:27 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco MMPPP

i'm talking strictly between your LNS and your CPE here, if you find your MMPPP is giving poor performance due to physical differences between the 2 sessions (ie speed and latency), then try doing something a little more creative like multihopping both ppp sessions onto the one router and using (as you mentioned) cef per-destination load sharing over the 2 unique ppp sessions, or alternatively let a routing protocol handle the work and advertise part of your subnet out one link and part out the other with redundancy, or even GRE tunnels etc etc.. there are quite a few ways you can achieve the desired outcome, this is of course only if your mmppp fails.

Cheers

Ben


On 16/07/2008, at 4:11 PM, Edi Guntoro wrote:

Thanks Ben,
however what do you mean by "better off load balancing with a routing protocol and/or cef" ? is it disabling the load balancing? as I know this feature enable by default on routing protocol as long as they are equal admin distances.
And is it for traffic out to the internet or traffic coming to the customer ?
regards.
Edi





----- Original Message ----
From: Ben Steele <ben.steele at internode.on.net>
To: Edi Guntoro <igoen99 at yahoo.com>
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 12:12:12 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco MMPPP

the LAC is pretty irrelevant, you need to configure MMPPP capabilities  
on your LNS's, which means an sgbp group on your LNS's for the  
multichassis and "ppp multilink" under your virtual template for the  
MPPP side of things.

I noticed your topology is using 2 seperate wireless services to  
provide the bundle, one word of warning is if the bundles are out of  
sync (speed and latency wise) you will see very poor performance and  
you are better off load balancing with a routing protocol and/or cef.

Ben

On 16/07/2008, at 2:13 PM, Edi Guntoro wrote:

> Dear ciscoers,
> Let's say we have a scenario to bring up multiple ppp for our  
> customer to increase bandwidth to the internet.
> At the moment we only have access to the LNS, is it possible to have  
> MMPPP for our customer, or is there something to do with the LAC?
> any reference?
> here is the layout:
> regards
> Igun
>
>
> u /-----3.5g service---PPP---LAC---LNS1--|
> s/                                                            | 
> ___internet
> e\                                                            |
> r \-----cdma service--PPP---LAC---LNS2--|
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


      


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list