[c-nsp] IS-IS: Ignore Attached Bit
Mark Tinka
mtinka at globaltransit.net
Sat Jul 26 09:42:43 EDT 2008
On Thursday 24 July 2008 05:19:28 Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists
wrote:
> > r(config)#router isis
> > r(config-router)#ignore-attached-bit
> > r(config-router)#
>
> When/why would you want to do that?
Just to add to what Shankar mentioned, in our particular
case, we only use IS-IS to carry our infrastructure and
Loopback addresses.
ALL customer prefixes (either from their own blocks or
assigned from ours) are maintained in iBGP.
We hold full BGP tables on most of our edge routers. We
don't run BGP in the core (core is based on MPLS
forwarding), and the core are L1/L2 IS's strung together.
Ignoring the ATT bit ensures we do not send traffic to
destinations BGP might not know about, only to drop
it "higher up" in the network. Moreover, since we use IS-IS
only for infrastructure and Loopback address reachability,
those routes are specifically carried within the network -
so no need for a default route.
Cheers,
Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20080726/a8869755/attachment.bin>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list