[c-nsp] Vs Ethernet over MPLS on Cisco 6500 with SUP2 and MFC2

[Phil Bedard]

If you don't need support for larger routing tables, the Sup32 works  
well for EoMPLS/VPN applications as well.

Phil


On Jun 18, 2008, at 3:20 PM, sthaug at nethelp.no wrote:

>> I have over a dozen of EoMPLS tunnels running in production over  
>> years on
>> 7609s
>> with OSM-4GE-WAN-GBIC linecards running 12.1(22)E1 without any  
>> problems.
>
> I'm glad it's working for you. However, it sounds like the original
> poster only has Sup2/MSFC2 and no OSMs. In this situation, I would
> claim that anybody wanting to buy *new* OSMs just to be able to have
> MPLS on the Sup2/MSFC2 seriously needs to rethink plans. Sup720 or
> RSP720 is definitely the way to go on the 6500/7600.
>
> Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/